P. v. Gomez CA2/7
A jury convicted defendant Samuel Gomez of willful infliction of corporal injury upon a spouse or cohabitant and making criminal threats. (Penal Code, §§ 273.5, 422.) Gomez argues his judgment of conviction must be reversed because: (1) the trial court erred in concluding that certain statements the victim made to a police officer were admissible under the hearsay exception for prior consistent statements; (2) defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to test whether there was blood on the knife that was allegedly used to commit the domestic abuse offense. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Gomez CA2/7