Edelstein v. Single Room Occupancy Corp. CA2/4
Michael Edelstein appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint against his landlord, Single Room Occupancy Housing Corp. (SRO), after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. The trial court found that a judgment in favor of SRO in a prior action based on the same set of facts barred the present action under the doctrine of claim preclusion. Edelstein contends that claim preclusion is inapplicable because the present action is based on a different contract from the prior action. We conclude that the trial court properly sustained the demurrer.
Comments on Edelstein v. Single Room Occupancy Corp. CA2/4