In re G.P. CA4/1
M.P. (Mother) appeals from two of the juvenile court's orders: (1) an order denying her motion under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 (section 388 motion) to modify prior orders placing her daughters G.P. and Krista P. (together, the girls) in foster care and setting a permanency planning hearing, and (2) an order terminating her parental rights under section 366.26. Mother claims the juvenile court erred in: (1) failing to set an evidentiary hearing on her section 388 motion; (2) finding that G.P. was generally adoptable; (3) finding the beneficial relationship exception to termination of parental rights did not apply (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)); and (4) finding the child-objection exception to termination of parental rights did not apply (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii)). Mother also asserts the girls maintain a bonded sibling relationship and must be adopted (or not) together. We conclude the juvenile court did not err on any asserted ground and accordingly, aff
Comments on In re G.P. CA4/1