Marriage of Grabiel CA4/3
Christine Grabiel appeals from an order quashing service of her petition for dissolution of marriage on her husband, Steven Grabiel. She contends the court erred because Steven made no showing that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over him, which is the sole basis for a motion to quash service of process. Rather, Steven’s motion was based on the existence of a forum selection clause in the parties’ prenuptial agreement—a clause which might justify an order dismissing or staying the action on the basis of forum non conveniens, but does not support an order quashing service.
Christine is correct, and we consequently reverse the order.
Comments on Marriage of Grabiel CA4/3