Weiser v. Clark CA6
Appellant Gabriel Clark challenges the trial court’s child custody order and its imposition of sanctions under Family Code section 271. He contends that reversal is required because the trial court (1) was biased against him and deprived him of due process and a fair hearing, (2) denied him the right to present evidence, (3) denied his request for a continuance, (4) abused its discretion in adopting its custody order, (5) improperly relied on the input of two of Clark’s daughters, and (6) improperly required Clark to pay attorney’s fees to respondent Milae Weiser’s attorney under Family Code section 271.
Comments on Weiser v. Clark CA6