legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bruggeman
Appellant who accepted a plea agreement for his role in a marijuana growth and sales operation, appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained under a search warrant. Appellant further contends that the court erred in imposing a parole revocation fine because imposition of his sentence was suspended. Court concluded that the warrant was supported by probable cause, but that the fine was not authorized. Court therefore modified the judgment by striking the fine and affirming.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale