P. v. Heuer CA3
Defendant Donald Edward Heuer challenges the conditions of his mandatory supervision, contending a condition requiring him to waive confidentiality for all court ordered programs is unconstitutionally overbroad and violates his right to privacy and privilege against self-incrimination. In supplemental briefing, defendant also challenges a condition requiring him to take all prescribed medication unless otherwise ordered by probation and behavioral health, arguing it is unconstitutionally overbroad. We agree with defendant that the challenged conditions are constitutionally infirm. We will affirm the judgment but remand with directions to the trial court to modify the disputed conditions of mandatory supervision.
Comments on P. v. Heuer CA3