In re Miguel V.
The minor appeals from a dispositional order placing him on probation for two years with various terms and conditions, following the finding by the juvenile court that the minor committed vehicle burglary and vehicle vandalism. On appeal the minor contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel as his counsel failed to bring a motion to suppress the in-field and in-court identifications of him by a witness. As court found that counsel’s performance did not fall below an objective standard of professional reasonableness, court affirmed the dispositional order.
Comments on In re Miguel V.