P. v. Adkins CA5
Appellant Caleb Ryan Adkins’s sole contention on appeal is that the prosecutor committed misconduct by commenting on his failure to testify, in violation of Griffin v. California (1965) 380 U.S. 609 (Griffin). Adkins contends his convictions for forcible oral copulation and attempted forcible rape must be reversed. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Adkins CA5