Christensen v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. CA1/2
After Randy Christensen was terminated from his job as a splicing technician, he sued his former employer, Pacific Bell Telephone Company (PacBell), alleging age discrimination, disability discrimination, and retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA, Gov. Code, § 12940 et seq.). He now appeals from the trial court’s award of summary judgment to PacBell. We conclude that PacBell is entitled to judgment on Christensen’s causes of action for age discrimination, but not on his causes of action for disability discrimination and retaliation and not on his claim for punitive damages. Accordingly, we shall affirm in part and reverse in part.
Comments on Christensen v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co. CA1/2