legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Ferguson v. Camarillo Health Care Dist. CA2/6
Clients are entitled by statute to arbitrate fee disputes, even if the attorney-client agreement does not provide for it. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6200 et seq.; Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory LLP (2009) 45 Cal.4th 557, 565.) Calling it an “unproductive waste of time,” attorney Ralph T. Ferguson did not participate in mandatory arbitration of a fee dispute with his client, Camarillo Health Care District (CHCD). The arbitrators ruled in favor of CHCD.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale