legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re E.G. CA2/6
E.G. challenges a disposition order committing him to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 731, subd. (a)(4), 734) after he stabbed a high school student with a knife. (Pen. Code, §§ 245, subd. (a)(4), 12022, subd. (b)(1)). We reverse the commitment order and remand for a new disposition hearing because no findings were made that a less restrictive placement would be inappropriate or ineffective, and substantial evidence does not support the finding that appellant would probably benefit from a DJJ commitment. (§ 734; In re Carlos J. (2018) 22 Cal.App.5th 1, 5.)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale