legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Hamilton CA1/3
Appellant Vanessa Hamilton was found guilty of felony arson and first-degree burglary. With additional allegations, including a commitment under Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b) (prison prior), Hamilton was sentenced to six years in state prison.
Hamilton claims that CALCRIM No. 1502’s instruction on the meaning of “burn” is inadequate and that the pinpoint instruction proposed by Hamilton and given by the court did not cure the error. She argues there was insufficient evidence that the inhabited structure burned. As to the lesser offense, the court gave CALCRIM No. 1520 (attempted arson) and CALCRIM No. 3518; Hamilton argues that the court’s oral explanation about completing the verdict form erroneously directed the jury not to consider the lesser offense until it had decided the arson charge. We find sufficient evidence to support the arson conviction and no instructional error as to the arson and attempted arson instructions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale