In re Ian S. CA1/1
Appellant admitted misdemeanor injuring a wireless communication device, a cell phone. The juvenile court declared appellant to be a ward of the court and placed him on probation, imposing various conditions, including an electronics search condition.
On appeal, appellant challenges the electronics search condition, claiming it must be stricken or modified because it is not reasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 (Lent), and is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.
We conclude the condition is valid under Lent but overbroad because it infringes on appellant’s rights to privacy and expression without being sufficiently tailored. We therefore modify the condition to limit the types of electronic information that may be searched. In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on In re Ian S. CA1/1