P. v. Nunez CA4/3
Appellant Anthony Nunez was convicted of making a criminal threat against Jane Adamo. On appeal, he contends: 1) There is insufficient evidence Adamo suffered sustained fear as a result of his threats; 2) the jury instruction on voluntary intoxication was too narrow; 3) defense counsel was ineffective for conceding appellant’s guilt in closing argument; 4) he was not afforded a speedy trial; 5) the trial court mishandled his numerous requests for a new attorney; and 6) cumulative error compels reversal. Finding appellant’s claims unmeritorious, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Nunez CA4/3