P. v. Salcido CA6
Moises Salcido appeals the judgment entered in four cases sentenced together by the trial court. Salcido does not challenge his convictions but instead asserts that the trial court erred in its oral pronouncement of the sentence in one of the cases. Both Salcido and the Attorney General request corrections to the abstracts of judgment. We find no error in the sentence pronounced by the trial court and agree that the abstracts of judgment should be corrected.
Comments on P. v. Salcido CA6