legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Arana CA2/4
Miguel Arana appeals from a judgment convicting him of first degree residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). Arana’s appellate counsel filed an opening brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) summarizing the facts in this case and the procedural history, but raising no issue, and asked this court to independently review the record, including the sealed record of an in camera review of police officer personnel records conducted pursuant to Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531, 538 (Pitchess). On May 24, 2018, the clerk of this court advised Arana that he had 30 days to submit any contentions or argument that he wished this court to consider. We received no response.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale