P. v. Huffman CA2/5
Defendant and appellant Ricky Valdez Huffman was convicted of unlawful firearm activity (Pen. Code, § 29825, subd. (a) ) and disobeying a court order (§ 166, subd. (a)(4)). On appeal, Huffman contends the trial court prejudicially erred by not instructing the jury on the definitions of attempt and specific intent when it instructed the jury on the elements of section 29825, subdivision (a). We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Huffman CA2/5