P. v. Tomlinson CA3
Convicted by jury of three counts involving the sexual molestation of a minor identified in the pleadings as John Doe (hereafter Doe 1), defendant Jared Michael Tomlinson contends (1) the trial court erred prejudicially by admitting evidence of uncharged acts pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1108 and 1101; (2) the prosecutor improperly made herself a witness and vouched for the victim’s credibility; and (3) the cumulative effect of the errors violated defendant’s right to due process. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Tomlinson CA3