legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Carter CA3
Defendant Christopher Stephen Carter challenges a victim restitution order requiring him to pay restitution to the victim’s husband who was not her spouse at the time of the crimes. We reverse the trial court’s order.
After sentencing defendant for committing numerous sex crimes against A.G., defendant’s stepdaughter, over a 12-year period, the trial court ordered defendant to pay victim restitution to A.G.’s husband, Austin. A.G. was not married during the time she was molested, but she was married at the time of trial. Austin accompanied her to California from out-of-state for the trial. Once here, in addition to attending trial, he transported her to and from the airport, court, various meetings with the prosecution team, and a counseling session. He requested, and was awarded, $2,480.11 in restitution for the costs associated with his travel and lost wages.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale