legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Olsen
Defendant pleaded no contest to manufacturing methamphetamine and admitted two narcotics related prior convictions. A count of possession of methamphetamine was dismissed. On appeal, defendant requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal.
Court's review of the record discloses two errors on the abstract of judgment. First, the restitution fines were imposed in the amount of $1,000 each, but the abstract erroneously lists them as $500 each. Second, the court security fee, booking fee and classification fees, along with the penalties and assessments, must be listed on the abstract. Court direct the trial court to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment. Court found no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale