Collin v. City of South Lake Tahoe CA3
Appellants Bruce Grego and Laurel Ames (collectively proponents) appeal following the trial court’s order finding unconstitutional a measure they proposed (Measure T) after it was passed by the voters of South Lake Tahoe. Plaintiff Jason Collin (plaintiff) and defendant the City of South Lake Tahoe (the city) (collectively respondents) argue proponents lack standing to appeal because the trial court denied them intervention. We conclude proponents do have standing to appeal, but only to challenge the court’s rulings in relation to their proposed motion to intervene. To this extent, proponents argue the trial court erred in denying their motion to continue and their oral motion to intervene. They also argue they were denied notice and the opportunity to be heard. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on Collin v. City of South Lake Tahoe CA3