legal news


Register | Forgot Password

City of Riverside v. Golden Valley Collective CA4/
This case involves a nuisance abatement action brought by the City of Riverside (City) against Golden Valley Collective (the Collective). The Collective opposed the issuance of the preliminary injunction by relying on the recently enacted Proposition 64, the Adult Use of Marijuana Act. The trial court issued the preliminary injunction based on the Collective’s violation of the City’s zoning law prohibiting any property use that violates state or federal law, and the Collective’s lack of proper license required to operate a marijuana business under state law. The Collective appealed.
On appeal, the Collective argues that the City’s medical marijuana restrictions were preempted by and violate Proposition 64. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale