In re N.S. CA5
Daryl S. appeals a judgment terminating his parental rights to his now nine-year-old daughter, Nicole S., and three-year-old son, Carlos P., (collectively the children) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. He also petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. In his appeal, Daryl contends evidence he is the children’s presumed father was ignored by the juvenile court and court-appointed counsel, resulting in prejudicial error. In his petitions, as well as in his appeal, he contends counsel was ineffective because she did not establish his status as presumed father.
Comments on In re N.S. CA5