legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.S. CA5
Daryl S. appeals a judgment terminating his parental rights to his now nine-year-old daughter, Nicole S., and three-year-old son, Carlos P., (collectively the children) under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. He also petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. In his appeal, Daryl contends evidence he is the children’s presumed father was ignored by the juvenile court and court-appointed counsel, resulting in prejudicial error. In his petitions, as well as in his appeal, he contends counsel was ineffective because she did not establish his status as presumed father.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale