In re K.G. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant B.K. (Father) appeals after the termination of his parental rights to K.G. (Minor) and the selection of adoption as Minor’s permanent plan at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing. Father makes one claim on appeal that the juvenile court should have ordered a guardianship rather than terminate his parental rights by applying the beneficial parent-child bond exception of section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i), as it served the best interests of Minor.
Comments on In re K.G. CA4/2