Peltier v. Roberts CA2/8
The trial court granted Shirley Peltier’s petition to confirm a FINRA arbitration award. Appellant James M. Roberts, formerly an investment advisor with Cullum & Burks Securities, Inc., appeals from the ensuing judgment. Relying on Code of Civil Procedure section 1286.2, subdivision (a)(4) and (5), Roberts argues reversal is required because Peltier’s claim was barred by the FINRA “statute of limitations,” he was not a FINRA member when the arbitration was conducted and did not consent to proceeding in that forum, and the arbitrators prejudicially erred in refusing to grant his request to postpone the arbitration hearing. Finding no error, we affirm.
Comments on Peltier v. Roberts CA2/8