In re M.M. CA 2/1
In this case, dependency proceedings commenced during a lengthy, contentious family law dispute. Father O.M. contends substantial evidence did not support dependency jurisdiction over his daughter M.M. We agree and reverse the juvenile court’s jurisdictional order and vacate its dispositional order.
Father also appeals from the juvenile court’s restraining order against him naming his daughter as one of the protected parties; he seeks modification of that order to remove his daughter as a protected party. We agree that modification is appropriate. We therefore remand the case to the juvenile court with directions to modify the restraining order and then dismiss the petition.
Comments on In re M.M. CA 2/1