legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Tabitha B. CA1/5
Tabitha B. appeals from an order denying her petition to vacate and seal two juvenile delinquency adjudications (Pen. Code, § 236.14). We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A May 2016 wardship petition alleged Tabitha, then 15 years old, committed misdemeanor battery on a peace officer. After considering a joint assessment report (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 241.1), the trial court determined Tabitha “would be ‘best served’ under the court’s delinquency jurisdiction[.]” It found Tabitha committed misdemeanor battery on a peace officer, adjudged her a ward of the court, and placed her on probation. Tabitha appealed; we affirmed. (In re Tabitha B. (June 12, 2017, A149826) [nonpub. opn.].) A second wardship petition alleged Tabitha committed vehicle theft and received stolen property. Tabitha admitted receiving stolen property and the court reinstated probation.
Third Wardship Petition and Probation Violation

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale