P. v. Javed CA5
Appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to support his robbery conviction. We conclude his conviction was supported by substantial evidence and affirm.
A jury convicted appellant of the following offenses: second degree robbery, with the additional allegation another principal armed with a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 211; 12022, subd. (a)(1)), possession of ammunition by a prohibited person (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1)); and possession of a stun gun by a convicted felon (§ 22610, subd. (a)).
Comments on P. v. Javed CA5