Salessi v. Peimani CA4/3
In 2004, Kareem Salessi filed the underlying complaint against 19 defendants, including respondent Farrokh Peimani, arising out of the purchase of a home in Laguna Niguel. Most of the defendants prevailed on demurrers or judgments on the pleadings. We affirmed several of those orders in a prior opinion filed in 2008. (Salessi v. Shadab (Sep. 30, 2008, G038002) [nonpub. opn.].) We described the complaint as “a desultory document to say the least,” noting it was overrun with conclusions and arguments and descended into a labyrinth of nonsensical conspiracy theories, highlighted by a claim that the White House ordered the attacks of September 11, 2001.
This case was resurrected when defendant Farrokh Peimani, who did not previously appear, successfully moved to vacate a default judgment, and subsequently obtained an order of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer. Salessi appealed from the order granting the motion to set aside the defaults, the judgment of dismissa
Comments on Salessi v. Peimani CA4/3