P. v. Jack CA1/5
William Davaughn Jack was convicted by a jury of pandering (Pen. Code, § 266i, subd. (a)(1); count one) and pimping (id., § 266h, subd. (a); count two). On appeal, Jack contends (1) the trial court abused its discretion in allowing an expert witness to testify to the ultimate issue of fact; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in permitting an investigating officer to offer expert testimony without being qualified as an expert; and (3) his pimping conviction is unsupported by substantial evidence. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Jack CA1/5