P. v. Eddines
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered following his plea of no contest to voluntary manslaughter and further admissions that a principal was armed with a firearm and that the offense was committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang. Defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which no issues were raised. Defendant submitted an argument, asserting the existence of an oral agreement regarding his plea that differed from the terms of a written agreement and his actual plea with respect to whether the gang enhancement could be imposed. Court affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Eddines