legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re R.S. CA4/2
S.P. (Mother) has a history of abusing drugs, failing to provide for her children’s needs and leaving the children unattended that led to the San Bernardino County Department of Children and Family Services (CFS) removing her five children from her home. Mother’s reunification services were terminated and a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing was set. About five months later, Mother filed a section 388 petition, which was summarily denied. Mother appeals from the juvenile court’s order denying her second section 388 petition without a hearing.
On appeal, Mother argues the juvenile court erred in summarily denying her second section 388 petition without a hearing because she had established prima facie evidence of changed circumstances and granting the petition was in the children’s best interest. Finding no error, we affirm the order denying Mother’s section 388 petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale