legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Mary S. CA5
Appellant Abel R. (father), appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and dispositional orders as to his now 12- and nine-year old daughters, Mary S. and Clare S., respectively. He contends the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings his daughters suffered or were at a substantial risk of suffering serious physical harm under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (a) are not supported by substantial evidence and the court’s removal orders under section 361, subdivision (a)(1) are inconsistent with its orders returning the girls to his custody under family maintenance services. We affirm the court’s jurisdictional findings but reverse the court’s removal orders and remand with directions to conduct a new dispositional hearing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale