P. v. Guerrero CA4/3
A police officer contacted defendant Enrique Guerrero and searched the vehicle he was driving. The officer found a loaded firearm under the passenger seat and additional ammunition in the trunk. The jury found Guerrero guilty of several crimes, including one count of unlawful possession of ammunition by a convicted felon.
On appeal, Guerrero argues that the trial court erred because it failed to instruct the jurors that they had to unanimously agree on which act of possession he committed: the ammunition inside of the vehicle or the ammunition in the trunk. We find that a “unanimity instruction” was not required under these facts.
Guerrero also asks this court to review a sealed portion of the record to determine if the trial court improperly failed to disclose the police officer’s personnel records during a Pitchess motion. We have done so and we find no errors.
Thus, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Guerrero CA4/3