legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Arendt CA1/4
Pursuant to this court’s order on the prior appeal in this matter (No. A148697), the trial court conducted an in camera review of Sergeant Johnson’s personnel records pursuant to Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531. The trial court determined that the file contained nothing required to be disclosed and, therefore, pursuant to this court’s order in No. A148697, reinstated the judgment after dismissing the conviction for attempted criminal threats in count 4. On appeal from the reinstated judgment, defendant has requested this court to review the sealed transcript of the in camera hearing. Having done so, we find that the trial court properly swore in the custodian of Sergeant Johnson’s records and did not abuse its discretion in determining there were no records improperly withheld. Therefore, the reinstated judgment is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale