In re B.K.M. CA5
V.M. (father), joined by L.T. (mother), appeals the juvenile court’s summary denial of father’s Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition requesting reunification services to be reinstated as to one of his children. Parents argue on appeal the court abused its discretion in determining father had not made a prima facie case of changed circumstances nor that the request would be in the best interests of the child. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re B.K.M. CA5