legal news


Register | Forgot Password

MetLife Securities v. Brandt CA2/3
Cross-defendants and appellants Scott Brandt (Brandt) and Westbridge Financial & Insurance Services, Inc. (Westbridge) (sometimes collectively referred to as Brandt), having prevailed on a cross-complaint, appeal a postjudgment order that denied their motion to recover more than $2.3 million in attorney fees from MetLife, Inc. (MetLife) and New England Life Insurance Company (NELICO).
Notwithstanding Brandt and Westbridge’s status as the prevailing parties on the cross-complaint, because they failed to demonstrate either a contractual or a statutory basis for an award of attorney fees, the order denying their motion for attorney fees is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale