Romero v. Honanian CA2/7
Plaintiff Edwin B. Romero appeals from an order granting defendant Raymond Honanian’s motion to set aside the default and default judgment entered against him. Romero contends the motion was erroneously granted because the default and default judgment were not void on their face and Honanian’s motion was otherwise untimely. Because Romero’s service of process by publication on Honanian was ineffective, the default and default judgment were void. We affirm.
Comments on Romero v. Honanian CA2/7