P. v. Ciurar CA3
As relevant to this appeal, defendants Filip Ciurar and Sabino Nino were convicted of two counts of robbery. Nino was also convicted of two counts of making criminal threats, and Ciurar was convicted of harboring a felon. The jury found the firearm allegations attached to defendants’ robbery charges not true. On appeal, Nino contends the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion and sufficient evidence does not support one of his robbery convictions. Ciurar also contends sufficient evidence does not support the same robbery conviction. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Ciurar CA3