In re H.D. CA4/3
Mother appeals from an order at a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing (.26 hearing) terminating her parental rights and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. She contends the court erred in three ways.
First, she contends she had stipulated to a dispositional order denying her reunification services on the condition that she be granted a drug patch. The drug patch was ordered, but the referral form did not check a particular box indicating it was funded. Nonetheless, the patch was authorized, and mother never attempted to have it applied. We conclude she forfeited her right to a drug patch. Even assuming the patch was inadvertently unfunded, funding was clearly authorized, and mother could have resolved that problem early in the case.
Comments on In re H.D. CA4/3