legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Ruddell v. Viscia
Plaintiff sued defendant for defamation, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and intentional infliction of emotional distress after a letter appellant allegedly wrote was disseminated to community leaders, respondent's competitors, and his clients that alleged respondent had engaged in questionable business dealings with at least two school districts. Appellant filed a special motion to strike the lawsuit under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.The trial court denied the motion, concluding that appellant failed to make a prima facie showing that the letter was connected to a public issue. Court disagree and reverse and remand the matter to the trial court for its determination of whether respondent is able to demonstrate a probability of prevailing on his claims.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale