legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Marshall CA2/6
David Marshall appeals a postjudgment order denying his Proposition 36 petition (Pen. Code, § 1170.126, subd. (b)) to recall his third-strike life sentences for attempted mayhem, assault with intent to commit mayhem, and assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury. Appellant contends, and the Attorney General agrees, that the petition makes a preliminary showing that appellant is serving a concurrent, life term for a non-serious felony, i.e., assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury. (See § 1170.126, subd. (e)(1); Couzens & Bigelow, Cal. Three Strikes Sentencing (The Rutter Group 2018) § 14:3, pp. 14-4 to 14-5.) We reverse and remand with directions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale