In re A.M. CA5
K.M. appeals from the juvenile court’s order made at the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (e) six-month review hearing. K.M. is the father of mother’s youngest child, A.M. At the six-month review hearing, the juvenile court ordered the children returned to mother’s care, after it found she made substantial progress in her case plan. Reunification services were terminated for K.M., as he failed to participate in services. K.M. appeals only the juvenile court’s visitation order, which read “visitation between [K.M.] and [A.M.] shall be supervised in accordance with the case plan.” The Kings County Human Services Agency (Agency) argues, inter alia, that K.M. forfeited his challenge to the visitation order by failing to object to it in the juvenile court.
Comments on In re A.M. CA5