Kim K. v. Superior Court CA4/3
In 2016, the Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) took the children of Kim K. (mother) and Gary G. (father) into protective custody. After providing reunification services for over two years, the juvenile court found that the return of custody to the parents would present a substantial risk of detriment to the children’s safety, protection, and well-being. The court terminated reunification services and set a future hearing regarding parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)
Mother has filed a petition for an extraordinary writ of mandate/prohibition in this court seeking to vacate the juvenile court’s orders. She argues that substantial evidence does not support the court’s factual finding of detriment. We disagree and deny the mother’s petition for extraordinary writ relief.
Comments on Kim K. v. Superior Court CA4/3