P. v. Hayde CA4/3
Eric Ryan Hyde appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of weapons, ammunition, and forged document offenses. Hayde argues the following: the trial court erred by admitting statements he made at the preliminary hearing while representing himself; the court erred by admitting a business record; and there was cumulative error. As we explain below, we conclude Hayde was not prejudiced by any errors. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hayde CA4/3