Callender v. Loper CA4/2
Plaintiff and appellant Paulette Callender was crossing the street when a car driven by defendant and respondent Rick Loper struck her at a low speed. At trial, the jury found that Loper was negligent but that his negligence did not cause Callender’s injuries. The trial court then denied Callender’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and motion for new trial. Because we find no evidence compelling a conclusion that Loper caused Callender’s injuries, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the JNOV. Because we also find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the new trial motion, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on Callender v. Loper CA4/2