P. v. Gordon CA4/2
Defendant and appellant Ralph Gordon appeals after the transfer of his probation from Los Angeles County to San Bernardino County. Upon the transfer, the San Bernardino County Probation Department recommended additional terms and conditions of probation “to ensure compliance of the offender and for Officer Safety.” Defendant objected to some of the new conditions, including the addition of an electronic device search condition. On appeal, defendant argues (1) the San Bernardino County Superior Court had no jurisdiction to add terms not previously imposed in Los Angeles County because no change in circumstances existed to justify the additional terms; (2) the condition requiring him to submit to search and seizure of any electronic device must be stricken because it is unreasonable under People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 (Lent), unconstitutionally overbroad, and significantly more invasive than necessary to serve any state interest in reformation and rehabilitation; and (3) the
Comments on P. v. Gordon CA4/2