P. v. Herring CA3
After defendant Brett Darren Herring stole a loaded trailer, a jury found him guilty of grand theft, vehicle theft, and possession of burglary tools. On appeal, he contends: (1) as to the grand theft count, the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the value of the stolen property is calculated by its fair market value; and (2) as to the vehicle theft count, the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that the vehicles’ value must exceed $950. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Herring CA3