P. v. Dias CA1/3
Humberto Dias was convicted by a jury of oral copulation with a child under 10. He contends the court committed prejudicial error when it (1) admitted expert testimony on Child Sexual Abuse Accommodation Syndrome (CSAAS), and (2) declined to modify CALCRIM No. 330, the standard instruction on evaluating the testimony of child witnesses. Neither contention is persuasive, so we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Dias CA1/3